In Australia, type 2 diabetes affects 1.2 million people and comprises 85-90% of all diabetes cases. This chronic condition, marked by elevated blood glucose levels, poses risks of severe health complications, including heart disease, kidney failure, and vision loss.
While diet plays a central role in managing blood glucose alongside exercise and medication, access to tailored dietary advice can be challenging and complex for many. In light of these barriers, a recent study highlights an alternative approach: time-restricted eating, a method that prioritizes when people eat over what they consume. The findings suggest that this method could rival personalized dietary guidance in its effectiveness at controlling blood glucose.
Understanding Time-Restricted Eating
Time-restricted eating (TRE), sometimes called the “16:8 diet,” gained attention around 2015 as a weight-loss strategy. Studies have since revealed its promise for people with type 2 diabetes in managing blood glucose. TRE involves confining eating to a set window each day—often from 11 a.m. to 7 p.m.—and fasting for the remaining hours. This pattern aligns with natural circadian rhythms, potentially aiding metabolic regulation and overall health.
For individuals with type 2 diabetes, TRE can be particularly beneficial. Many experience their highest blood glucose readings in the morning, and delaying breakfast until mid-morning may allow physical activity to lower glucose levels beforehand, setting the stage for the day’s first meal.
Research Findings
In 2018, an initial study assessed the feasibility of TRE for people with type 2 diabetes. Participants maintained the eating pattern five days a week for four weeks and saw a decrease in time spent at high blood glucose levels. Further studies have validated these results, showing improvements in HbA1c—a key measure of average blood glucose levels over three months.
However, previous studies provided intensive support through frequent meetings, a level of support that’s often inaccessible for the average person managing diabetes.
The Current Study
In the new study, researchers directly compared TRE with traditional dietary advice from an accredited practicing dietitian over six months. Fifty-two participants, aged 35 to 65, were divided into two groups: one receiving dietary advice and the other practicing TRE. Each participant managed their diabetes with up to two oral medications, and over the course of six months, both groups attended four consultations within the first four months, followed by a two-month period of self-management.
For those in the diet group, consultations focused on blood glucose management through dietary changes, such as increased vegetable intake and reduced alcohol consumption. In the TRE group, the advice centered around limiting eating to a nine-hour window between 10 a.m. and 7 p.m. Blood glucose levels were monitored every two months via HbA1c testing, and participants regularly reported on their experience with dietary changes.
Promising Results
TRE was found to be as effective as traditional dietary intervention, with both groups showing reduced blood glucose levels. Initial improvements were most notable in the first two months, and some participants in both groups experienced weight loss of 5-10 kg. TRE participants reported a smoother adjustment to the eating pattern, often aided by family support, and some noted improvements in sleep.
Participants in the TRE group also showed an interest in additional dietary guidance after two months, suggesting a potential for further lifestyle adjustments. Meanwhile, adherence to the diet plan was lower in the traditional dietary advice group, indicating that TRE may serve as a simpler entry point for people managing diabetes.
Is TRE a Practical Solution?
Though social events, caregiving duties, and work schedules can interfere with adhering to a restricted eating window, TRE offers advantages. Its simplicity—focusing on when to eat rather than specific foods—could make it adaptable across diverse cultural backgrounds without the need to alter food choices.
For many Australians who lack access to a dietitian, TRE provides an alternative, effective strategy for managing type 2 diabetes. While it’s still recommended to follow general dietary guidelines and prioritize nutritious foods, TRE may encourage broader health improvements as people gain confidence in managing their condition.
Nonetheless, TRE may not be suitable for everyone, especially those on medications that discourage fasting. It’s advisable for anyone considering this approach to consult their healthcare provider for personalized guidance.
This study highlights TRE’s potential as a practical, accessible tool for type 2 diabetes management, empowering individuals to take greater control of their health and make positive changes over time.
Related topics:
Increase in Prescriptions for Weight-Management Drugs Among Type 1 Diabetes Patients
Rising Diabetes Rates in Indonesia: A Public Health Crisis
Decline in Type 2 Diabetes Incidence: A Mixed Picture for Australian Communities
